Team Chat Logs

July 30, 2009

2009 6
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
<< <   > >>

[04:41:20]<arg>nsz: well the way to go is mongoose
[04:43:33]<arg>__20h__: use gmail, that doesn't suck 1GB of RAM
[04:44:56]<nsz>it just suck your privacy ;)
[04:46:10]<nsz>can mongoose do virtual hosts?
[04:58:57]<arg>privacy is just an artefact of being ashamed about one self
[04:59:41]<arg>nsz: not directly but it has an API to achieve vhosts quite easily, so in a way configuration through additional code
[05:00:08]<nsz>i see
[05:00:09]<arg>nsz: I'm working on implementing vhost support initially,
[05:00:29]<arg>once that's done I think we can migrate at some point
[05:00:45]<arg>with this API interface one could also write werc directly as part of mongoose
[05:01:32]<arg>but I think keeping werc as is, but having 9base3 as dependency is good
[05:01:54]<arg>I haven't finished 9base-3
[05:18:08]<__20h__>arg, what's if gmail is down?
[05:18:31]<Gottox>__20h__: then the internet is broken.
[05:18:52]<uriel>the web is the internet, google is the web!
[05:18:59]<__20h__>Is the offline Gmail app able to offline store messages?
[05:19:06]<uriel>thenfore, google is teh internets!
[05:19:06]<arg>__20h__: yes
[06:18:16]<arg>what was the new simpler BSD license?
[06:18:25]<arg>I mean the even simpler one than MIT?
[06:20:40]<spaceinvader>arg: ISC
[06:20:41]<spaceinvader>arg: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/src/share/misc/license.template?rev=1.2;content-type=text%2Fplain
[06:29:58]<arg>thx
[06:40:26]<rokuko>wasnt there a copy paste improvement patch to surf here a while ago?
[06:41:11]<rokuko>usually i select the link i want to open before hitting ^G
[06:44:07]<spaceinvader>rokuko: you can press ^y to go to the URL on clipboard
[06:44:16]<spaceinvader>err sorry, ^p
[06:44:21]<spaceinvader>^y to copy current urlo
[06:45:04]<rokuko>i wasnt aware of that feature :-)
[06:45:09]<rokuko>thx
[12:02:17]<dethredic>Hey guys, I am trying to apply this patch: http://lists.suckless.org/dev/0907/0644.html but so far I am not getting any results. I tried putting this: "#define marginbottom 18" in my config.h, but that doesn't give me the bottom bar.
[12:14:23]<dethredic>wait nvm
[12:14:31]<dethredic>I am just getting an error while patching...
[12:28:20]<opafan48>hi
[12:29:37]<opafan48>i need a tool for collecting snipplets which doesnt suck.. it doesnt matter if its cli only..
[12:29:54]<nsz>collecting what?
[12:30:17]<opafan48>one-liners, quotes or similar
[12:30:29]<nsz>ah
[12:31:03]<nsz>text editor?
[12:31:38]<nsz>quotes are separated by newline (or two)
[12:32:15]<opafan48>i d build my own structure and so on..
[12:32:32]<nsz>structure?
[12:32:42]<nsz>what do you mean
[12:32:58]<opafan48>quotes should be named and may be semi-structured..
[12:33:52]<opafan48>i found this one http://treeline.bellz.org/scrnsht.html, but i think its too heavy (python/qt4...)
[12:34:10]<nsz>omg
[12:34:44]<nsz>once you have effective text processing tools a separate app for this will look overkill
[12:35:23]<nsz>unless you really have a lot's of quotes
[12:35:40]<nsz>and you use it for some special purpose regularly
[12:37:07]<opafan48>well it seems like most ppl r using some webtools to save such things..
[12:38:06]<nsz>really?
[12:38:10]<Rasi>hmm.. has anyone succeded to make xfce's terminal work in wmii?
[12:38:22]<Rasi>it always opens new windows on the same tag where the 1st has been opened
[12:38:33]<nsz>here is a fortune data file:
[12:38:36]<nsz>http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/games/fortune/datfiles/fortunes?rev=1.39
[12:38:36]<Rasi>and no, i cant use urxvt - i get complete system lockups with it
[12:40:32]<nsz>probably your system has some problems then
[12:41:57]<Rasi>its the nvidia driver causing this
[12:42:04]<Rasi>it works with nv and vesa
[12:50:59]<opafan48>does dmenu work on win32 or cygwin?
[13:01:06]<bobbert>Hey guys, I just tried two patches for dwm, and they both failed (Hunk #1 FAILED at xxx)
[13:01:19]<bobbert>does that mean I am doing it wrong, or both the patches are bad?
[13:05:45]<nsz>or old
[13:06:09]<nsz>there are only a few patches for the latest dwm
[13:06:17]<nsz>the rest should be ported
[13:06:29]<bobbert>nsz, how can I tell if they are old?
[13:07:28]<nsz>if they fail then they are old
[13:07:30]<nsz>duh
[13:10:13]<opafan48>hehe
[13:12:08]<dpb>usually the page you download the patch from says what version of dwm they're for
[13:13:19]<dpb>I'm still using my patched version of 5.4.. too lazy to port them to the latest..
[13:13:23]<n0nsense>again...
[13:13:34]<n0nsense>can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? :D
[13:13:42]<n0nsense>http://ix.io/6E/
[13:13:56]<n0nsense>as soon as it works I will port it to dwm > 5.2
[13:14:56]<dpb>why don't you just straight use 5.6.1? <.<
[13:15:17]<n0nsense>because I'm still using 5.2 everywhere
[13:15:31]<n0nsense>also, I'm using dwm-gtx
[13:15:39]<n0nsense>hm
[13:16:10]<n0nsense>dpb: I don't think it makes that much difference... only the multimonitor stuff
[13:16:23]<n0nsense>dpb: do you think it would be better using 5.6?
[13:16:58]<n0nsense>my dwm has a lot of layout patches etc
[13:17:17]<n0nsense>I'm lazy and I don't have multiple monitors so I'm not really interested in that
[13:17:39]<dpb>5.6 has new xinerama support for multiple monitors, and arg was talking a bit ago if he should merge dwm-gtx into the mainline, I dunno what the result of that was
[13:18:26]<n0nsense>as I said, it doesn't make too much difference
[13:18:31]<n0nsense>I just want to get this running
[13:19:06]<n0nsense>I think it would be a large improvement to have exceptions to the tagging behaviour for certain views
[13:19:20]<dpb>But anyway, I'm not the person to help you with that patch, I haven't done much dwm hacking.. :P
[13:19:33]<n0nsense>me neither :D
[13:20:47]<n0nsense>I wrote a bstack patch for dwm-gtx when vanilla-dwm didn't have one
[13:20:59]<n0nsense>but there wasn't so much of dwm internals involved
[13:46:57]<rokuko>[surf] if downloading a file the site title includes the downloading progress in percent [88%] if completed the [100%] vanishs, i think that doesnt make much sense and a [100%] might be helpful what do you think?
[15:33:05]<arg>https://wiki.har2009.org/page/Main_Page (just noticed, it's sold out already, can't believ!)
[15:37:33]<apo__>Some people have too much money :P
[15:38:47]<nsz>or it should have been in a larger area
[15:43:33]<arg>http://r-36.net/static/pictures/wth05/1/dsc00105.jpg
[15:43:42]<arg>that are nice memories on wth
[15:43:57]<arg>yea indeed, at wth I payed at the entrance
[15:44:16]<arg>now is no reason to go to har, even not temptation
[17:00:26]<linkmaster03>when i send a query in irssi, the following is output to the terminal two times, and i don't know why. i've tried different terminals. this didn't occur on openbox
[17:00:30]<linkmaster03>Cannot get client list properties.
[17:00:32]<linkmaster03>(_NET_CLIENT_LIST or _WIN_CLIENT_LIST)
[17:00:42]<spaceinvader>arg: hmm, what do you thing about the different conferences
[17:00:51]<spaceinvader>arg: i want to try and get to CCC this christmas
[17:15:31]<bobbert>could someone please update this for dwm 5.6: http://lists.suckless.org/dev/0907/0644.html
[17:15:37]<bobbert>thanks in advance
[17:15:55]<shatter>why don't you do it?
[17:17:49]<shatter>just add the 3 lines to the code
[17:17:52]<bobbert>I have no idea how
[17:18:00]<bobbert>could you elaborate?
[17:18:09]<shatter>look at the patch
[17:18:25]<shatter>look for the line above the ones that start with +
[17:18:47]<bobbert>yes
[17:18:59]<shatter>then add the 3 lines with the + in front of them below it
[17:19:09]<shatter>(remove the starting +)
[17:19:35]<bobbert>so the "+" just comments things out?
[17:19:52]<shatter>no, the + tells patch "add this line"
[17:20:11]<shatter>it'll tell your compiler something completely different ;)
[17:20:37]<bobbert>so I am just removing the 3 "+" symbols?
[17:21:11]<bobbert>or duplicating the 3 lines, and removing the "+" on 3 of them
[17:21:17]<shatter>the latter
[17:21:38]<linkmaster03>you're adding the 3 lines with + in front of them to your dwm.c (where the patch shows they go) and taking out the +
[17:21:46]<shatter>yes
[17:22:03]<shatter>the patch should apply
[17:22:06]<shatter>actually
[17:22:29]<shatter>no need to copy & paste anything
[17:23:15]<bobbert>when I try to apply it I get this error: 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file dwm.c.rej
[17:31:17]<bobbert>ok, anyways, how do I know where to add those three lines in my dwm.c
[17:38:27]<bobbert>well, I think I added it correctly, but nothing happens
[17:48:39]<linkmaster03>just go to the line it says in the patch, 1674, and add the lines where it shows they go
[17:49:38]<bobbert>linkmaster03, ok, I did that. Nothing happens though
[17:50:01]<linkmaster03>put them in, recompile dwm, restart dwm
[17:50:09]<bobbert>did that
[17:50:36]<bobbert>linkmaster03, I also added #define marginbottom 18 in my config.h
[17:50:51]<linkmaster03>then i don't know
[17:54:47]<bobbert>alright
[18:33:55]<apo__>1st
[18:42:38]<spaceinvader>22:59 -!- antoszka [~antoszka@cl-142.waw-01.pl.sixxs.net] has joined #suckless
[18:42:38]<spaceinvader>23:36 < apo__> 1st
[18:42:40]<spaceinvader>the irony
[18:43:26]<antoszka>Isn't it. :)
[19:53:32]<apo__>http://0au.de/~apo/deadcat.jpg :D